*but the problem there is that it was probably assimilated by the writer who doesn't quite understand the technology and hence made the two mistakes (one bad one and one that is just another way of looking at everything).*

Yes, I completely agree with you here, Steve, that it was probably the writer who erred in his understanding of the technology and not that it was POET sending out a different message than the one that they've been sending out all along. Hopefully, very soon, the two (writers and the writer's understanding of the POET technology) won't have this sort of mismatch anymore.