Not concerned about trading gaps, overblown TA stuff.
Am concerned about whatever gap, if any, there is between "scaled to 100nm" and "achieving MS8." I was previously figuring that they were one and the same, but then someone posted something about understanding English, and some upper case letters and then some stuff about channels, and I was essentially done.
The article is unequivocal about having scaled to 100nm, so what is left to accomplish or prove or verify in order to be able to state that MS8 has been reached?