Re: A case against a POET "Machine"
posted on
Jun 20, 2014 05:21AM
Thanks for pointing that out Derek. I've been really busy all day and night so haven't read anything since posting that. Yeah, the articles really did say it would consume 80 times less energy. The graph on the video showed a comparison in energy consumption (in Gigajoules I think) that showed they really did mean that current tech used 80 times more than "The Machine" as Andrea rightly pointed out. I guess because I understood the idea they were trying to convey my busy mind missed the faux pas in the logic. You have to admit it sounds impressive though. I have a feeling they aren't comparing apples to apples. I will dig into it a little deeper when I have more time. I haven't even read all the posts tonight yet. I just skipped through the thread to check the responses. Just a thought I wanted to get out there. Goodnight. Green