I'd like to take a moment to thank Eileen for the exceptional work illustrating the monumental marketing potential for POET. I think she gets it. Lots of dd there too. I find the placement of seating at EC intriguing. POET (DR. Manocha at the head table with Google Brass) I see lots of potential there since Google needs what POET offers. Thank you Tombot for that. I hope the link I posted works ok. It is a Power Point Presentation of Ajit Manocha's Fab 2.0 - file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/My%20Documents/Opening%20Keynote_Ajit%20Manocha_GLOBALFOUNDRIES._Public.pdf

If this doesn't work please let me know and I'll get it done. It is pretty neat.

It really shows the collaborative aspect he is proposing. I posted a while ago, some thoughts refering to the many chips and convoluted aspect and size of Apples's Iphone6, referring to a post regarding how many of the small specialized companies would be elimated with POET. I think to the contrary, those companies will come to POET, get their TDK and use it as a template to incorporate their IP into the "System on a Chip" (SoC). I called this "Open Source", not share ware. Those guys would have to pay POET for the PDK and Engineering of it to get it incorporated within the SoC, and pay license fees to continue - our revenue stream. This would not deminish the great IP input but increase it. Kind of like what Microsoft did - open and not what Apple did - closed. All the IP contributors under one roof working together within the POET format. I was surprised to see Fairchij mention something to the same affect the other day - Open Source for POET. Collaboration with a revenue stream. I think this is what Google wants rather than a monopoly for their server farms, so POET may fit right in. Also the technology that can keep up with them. I didn't mention the increase in speed, decrease in energy consumption (green), and opening for optic and quantum computing, etc. Anyway just some thoughts. Interested to see what Google has in mind with POET