Andy: I hope the efforts by board members to publish a sa reply article is going forward on an expafdited basis .

The only thing that will reverse is positive news and facts presented that are reliable and authoritative to rebulk the garbage being set forth in these sa 's articles.

Andy, I have highlighted the only two words (IMO) that are going to have any effect on the SP.

There have been more than enough "facts" (and by facts, I mean what one chooses to believe) published by many on this board and none of it has done anything to encourage, move or sustain a higher share price.

Does anybody here really know the facts?

All of what we believe on the positive side of this disruptive technology only comes true and factual when and if someone starts paying for it and in a big way.

I am a shareholder and I will continue to be for a longer period only because I "want" to believe that the "facts" are true and this truly is a disruptive and "valuable" technology.

At the end of the day why spend a lot of time writing authoritive articles hoping to move the SP from $1.30 to $1.50? If this truly is a $70.00 stock it will be regardless of the MMs or anybody else.

I would suggest we all save the ink and anguish, cross our fingers and wait it out.

GLTA