Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Maintaining or gaining
25
May 18, 2015 10:19AM
9
May 18, 2015 10:32AM
19
May 18, 2015 10:50AM
5
May 18, 2015 10:58AM
9
May 18, 2015 10:58AM
21
May 18, 2015 11:12AM
7
May 18, 2015 11:13AM
2
May 18, 2015 11:28AM
3
May 18, 2015 12:08PM
2
May 18, 2015 12:13PM
27
May 18, 2015 12:28PM
17
May 18, 2015 12:37PM
6
May 18, 2015 12:46PM
4
May 18, 2015 01:15PM
20
May 18, 2015 01:28PM
5
May 18, 2015 01:44PM
30
May 18, 2015 01:59PM
5
May 18, 2015 04:43PM
7
May 18, 2015 05:06PM
9
May 18, 2015 05:42PM
3
May 18, 2015 07:23PM
5
May 18, 2015 08:40PM
4
May 19, 2015 12:50AM
2
May 19, 2015 02:56AM
4
May 19, 2015 04:51AM

May 19, 2015 03:26PM

Here's some more info on the impact of reverse splits on share prices. This material (PDF) is from Andrew Hall who is a managing director at the Nasdaq. I received it via Christopher Chu.

While many folks on this forum expect a detrimental effect of a reverse split on a share price, Andrew Hall clearly distinguishes two separate cases:

  1. A stock is declining and the company executes a reverse split in order to maintain its listing on the exchange it is trading on. In this case the effect is indeed usually detrimental.
  2. A company executes a reverse split in order to gain a listing at a "higher" exchange. In this case the share price usually benefits from the reverse split. Andrew proves his point by 28 charts of stocks that experienced reverse splits in his material.

So it's all about maintaining or gaining. I think we don't need to discuss whether the first or the seconds case applies to POET Technologies. The reverse split is just a tool that will be used if (and only if) needed to gain the Nasdaq listing. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing to worry about. It's good to have it in our toolbox!

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply