Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: re: listing
7
Oct 02, 2015 01:30PM
7
Oct 02, 2015 01:36PM

Oct 02, 2015 01:47PM
7
Oct 02, 2015 01:51PM
1
Oct 02, 2015 01:52PM
12
Oct 02, 2015 02:01PM

Oct 02, 2015 02:17PM
2
Oct 02, 2015 02:28PM

Oct 02, 2015 02:40PM
4
Oct 02, 2015 02:41PM
4
Oct 02, 2015 02:53PM
2
Oct 02, 2015 03:35PM
8
Oct 02, 2015 03:42PM
3
Oct 02, 2015 03:47PM

Oct 02, 2015 04:51PM
4
Oct 02, 2015 05:07PM
2
Oct 02, 2015 05:10PM
3
Oct 02, 2015 05:14PM

Oct 02, 2015 05:22PM
1
Oct 02, 2015 05:27PM
2
Oct 02, 2015 05:41PM
5
Oct 02, 2015 05:45PM
5
Oct 02, 2015 05:52PM
7
Oct 02, 2015 06:24PM
1
Oct 02, 2015 08:20PM
9
Oct 02, 2015 08:28PM
16
Oct 02, 2015 09:07PM

Oct 03, 2015 12:34PM
20
Oct 03, 2015 01:46PM
9
Oct 03, 2015 01:54PM

Oct 03, 2015 02:03PM

When someone says they are a "US Company", that could mean anything from a tax perspective. It could be "resident for tax purposes", which would be a US taxation issue for sure. It could be a Canadian Company with a US location(s). Depends where "mind and management" is, which tends to be one of those over-riding tests.

As long as we have a dual listing, all of us will own a Canadian Company as long as we hold the TSX listed shares.

Even if they don't have the dual listing and only a US listing, it is no different than any of us owning Google shares, for example. We participate in the profits and losses after taxation of the jurisdictions that raise the taxes based on their tax laws.

Does that answer the question(s)?

Jimbo

1
Oct 05, 2015 01:11PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply