Dear TEPO,

The only clear evidence is the TRAB with Tony Blevins as a member. There are also unconformed reports of as many as 18 Apple Engineers at Stoors in Feb- Mar 2015. PC also commented at some point how members of this board contacting APPLE direcly had caused him some difficulty dealing them (loose talk). I won't go over my therory in detail but management have not explained why PET which had been the technical proirtiy until changed in Sep 15. What happened to all that 18 months of effort What was the outcome of BAE 6 month contract and the purpoase of the Synopsys.

Another fator of sorts is managment prebriefing they will not anwerr questions. at briefings as late as February 16 When a simple denial would be perfectly acceptable if there was no relationship with Apple.

Those are the dots they are not specualtion they are factors which until a clarified remain open to my mind. I have already speculated that is this PO the moment that Apple would take a share. There were other rumours which are not repeatable but clearly smart phones were illustrated in previous as a POET application. The question is did Apple by or license POET IP in Aug 15 for the 40 engineer development that PC talked about. Was synopsys PTK used as the method of transferring POET IP to APPLE, they have not featured since and we were never billed as far as I can see from the published accounts.

For me there is too much logic to deny that APPLE might have an interest in PTI. Othere feel this is speculation and may prove to be correct. I still feel it is an avenue worth considering. THey APPLE need POE/PET to advance next generations of their smart pnones to my mind and would if they believe in being at the technical leading ege and Blevins has taken an interest there continues to be mileage in this theory.

Im happy to be wron I just want others to give ratinal reasons why, to date this has not happened so I contiue with this old chestnut.

sula