Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Free
Message: Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Re: Try to be objective
15
turr
Jan 17, 2017 12:17PM
Icon president Re: Try to be objective
39
bluecollardollar
Jan 17, 2017 12:54PM
Re: Try to be objective
1
ark99isback
Jan 17, 2017 01:21PM
Icon president Re: Try to be objective
19
bluecollardollar
Jan 17, 2017 01:56PM
Re: Try to be objective
5
phil-v
Jan 17, 2017 02:12PM
Re: Try to be objective
2
ark99isback
Jan 17, 2017 02:22PM
Icon president Re: Try to be objective
16
bluecollardollar
Jan 17, 2017 02:34PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
4
monolithic
Jan 17, 2017 03:24PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
7
ark99isback
Jan 17, 2017 03:29PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
8
mo
Jan 17, 2017 03:41PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
6
ark99isback
Jan 17, 2017 03:54PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
5
jackthebear1
Jan 17, 2017 03:55PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
3
mo
Jan 17, 2017 04:07PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
4
tamaraw
Jan 17, 2017 07:26PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
3
mo
Jan 17, 2017 07:45PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)

tamaraw
Jan 17, 2017 08:59PM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
2
Aves99isback
Jan 18, 2017 12:45AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
5
mo
Jan 18, 2017 06:53AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
6
Aves99isback
Jan 18, 2017 09:14AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
3
mo
Jan 18, 2017 09:20AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
2
Aves99isback
Jan 18, 2017 09:26AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
4
mo
Jan 18, 2017 09:37AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
7
Aves99isback
Jan 18, 2017 09:38AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
5
mo
Jan 18, 2017 09:41AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)

monolithic
Jan 18, 2017 09:41AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
19
cheapinski
Jan 18, 2017 09:50AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
40
Aves99isback
Jan 18, 2017 09:52AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
9
Aves99isback
Jan 18, 2017 09:55AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
6
jackthebear1
Jan 18, 2017 09:59AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
14
ark99isback
Jan 18, 2017 09:59AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
6
stockguru72
Jan 18, 2017 10:30AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
4
Junkers87
Jan 18, 2017 10:30AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
8
jojorogers
Jan 18, 2017 10:55AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
5
gr8day44
Jan 18, 2017 11:08AM
Re: Try to be objective (re-Subhash)
6
GlassHalfFull
Jan 18, 2017 12:36PM

Although a buy out is not impossible, all they would get is DensLight, and the yet unproven IP and history of efforts to produce a working IR transceiver.   If Poet can claim success with the transceiver, a buy out would be in dollars, not pennies imo.  Question is, is someone out there willing to pay .45 to .55 cents/share, for DenseLight, (a big price for DL, which is itself still in the development stage) and the yet unproven Intellectual Property of Poet, namely the VCSEL?

    

 

2 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply