Quantum, having been to the last two AGM's, I really don't think it's all that tough for management to conduct the meeting.  Yes, there may be some pointed questions and certainly displeased shareholders, but unlike some on this forum, I've seen nothing but respectful conduct on both sides.  For my money and my investment, that's the way I like to see things.

I'm very unlikely to be able to attend, due to a work conflict, but I would be surprised to see anything too out of line from shareholders.  Management is trying hard to succeed in the tech business while handling the PR businesss perhaps awkwardly, but as well as they know how.  They are not experienced in the public company arena.  They have brought on a consultant that is very experienced, let's see if that makes a difference in the overall tenor of the AGM.  

I guess nothing less than management entering the AGM in sackcloth and ashes would satisfy some, and for certain extremists here, resignation in hand would also be required.  

I'd be more than happy with a simple, "we needed the money for _________, and we were as surprised and disappointed in the results of the offering as anyone.  Tom Mika will help us to make sure we don't miscalculate the market's reaction to any future fund raising."

Anything to help shareholders get over that disappointing chapter would be much appreciated, but, bottom line, not necessary.