Re: 2%?

Aiming to become the global leader in chip-scale photonic solutions by deploying Optical Interposer technology to enable the seamless integration of electronics and photonics for a broad range of vertical market applications

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

60Bowtie

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 394 [?]

Votes: 91 Score: 1.9 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: 2%?

posted on Jul 30, 2017 10:42PM

Yes ITTR absolutely, persentages when you're considering millions/billions do make a considerable difference, what I was asking is why this thread has any relivence to its original intent?

Paraphrasing: the "subjected reason" they "ditched GaAS" was to avoid paying UCONN royalties for the efforts they provided to get the technology going in the first place.

Giving up 3% to keep 97% in my humble opinion is nothing if the launch to a distruptive technology started by UCONN hosting the lab fundamentals.

Thank you INTR for you post but my question still stands, I don't see the point in this thread.