We are familier with the tiresome ‘yah boo sucks’ analysis offered here from time to time by certain posters.   It really belongs to another forum, but it is tolerated here in the interest of having a range of opinions, well for a while at least.  But lately we seem to have attracted a blight of such comment at a time when the company is delicately poised and uncertainties lead to doubt, an emotional reaction not a rational one in the circumstances to my mind.

Vacuous and empty, generalisation without accompanying evidence makes them useless (yes I know what you’re thinking Baba) for any worthwhile consideration of the progress of POET Technolgies Inc . Personally I feel PTI is moving through a mire of difficulties (negotiations) that are unavoidable to any firm producing new technology, at high calculated risk, whether they are financially, technically or administratively based.  The Timing of or project planning is known for its great difficulty to predict accurately.  Planning although  entirely in the hand of management is therefore more art than science, therefor expect glitches treat them as risk management.

Consequently,  It is particularly erksome to me to hear complaint and condemnation of management for not conforming to plans laid down or its sequel they’ve got or POET has ‘done nothing’ which is the cause celeb of the ‘yah boo sucks mentality’ offered by those certain posters.  

My point is that anyone who cannot see defacto progress and good performance by PTK management in the material that has been produced by the firm to date can only have malicious or SP manipulative reasons for saying so at this delicate point and should therefore not be tolerated for long, given this board’s purpose is to share information (DD) with a group who wish to balance their judgement of PTK performance to decide whether to remain invested or not.

 The kitchen is getting hot, get out or sweat it out - no winging’s allowed when it gets tough.  Throw them out, it unsettles the troops.

sula