Agreed Baba, TM is the CFO not a technically savvy stock marketing guru. It's entirely possible he was "volunteered" into this side of the desk responsibilty as a means to save the company some cash, as opposed to hiring an additional body to "sell" the company to investors.  Besides, seems to me our Senior VP of Strategic Marketing and Product Management, Rich Zoccolillo, should be contributing on this front; if he still works for the company, that is.

It's very clear that despite our perceived technological progress there remains a significant and glaring disconnect between where we think we are and where the market does.

My expectations were: as industry insiders and technical experts caught wind of our progress, we would see a slow incremental rise in buying interest.  After all, who else would be better positioned to get in on the ground floor but those who truly understand the significance of the disruptive nature of the technology, and for the most part these are just regular people who would have no problem making a personal investment in something they see as a potential money maker.  To date, this has not happened.

Does it really matter?  In the very short term, perhaps.  However, the company appears to be on track with technology development and customer engagement, so will eventually be able to announce deals and revenue.  IMO, there's no doubt this will drive share price, whether a little or a lot remains to be seen.  In the meantime, the concern remains liquidity (ie cash), which brings us back to TM.