lumenge: "Why not post about competing tech, nobody has shown their tech to be superior, far from it."

Exactly!  Pro and Con information should not be weighted on a rigged scale.  Each piece of information deserves individual analysis and the Ostrich head in the Sand technique of analysis is fundamentally flawed from the beginning.  Thank you, again, lumenge, for your carefully considered and sagacious opinion.

On 14 August I posted:

Re: Vivek

400G Tranceivers available as of this month from this company in Shenzen:  

400G Transceivers | FIBERSTAMP Technology Co. Ltd. | Aug 2022 | Photonics.com

My hope was that someone on the POET Hub would know more about this and comment about whether it was anything of concern, Pro or Con to POET. 

I would have been very pleased if someone on the tech side of life would have looked closely at Fiberstamp Technology Co. Ltd and opined that it was no threat to POET's efforts in the same area. 

My expectation was, and remains, that one of the Tech Gurus will take a look at the Fiberstamp Technology Co. Ltd effort and come to the same opinion that lumenge gave about the example he listed in his post:

" nobody has shown their tech to be superior, far from it."

Why would any investor, POET investor or investor in any other company, want to not examine all information, both Pro and Con, about a company they are either considerting to invest in or have already invested in is beyond comprehension.  Of course you want to know all the "good stuff" about your investment, but you don't blind yourself to the warts on it's face at the same time.

Regardless of this controversy about posting information Pro and Con respective of POET, the fact remains we still need to see POET Purchase Orders.  Everything else is "Fluff".  And we have had a lot of "Fluff".

Okiedo