I have been here with POET for several years, and if only due to stubbornness I will remain holding my rather substantial position. However, as any good speculator/investor should know, due diligence is a prerequisite to protecting one's capital. But in POET's case, unless one is an insider with not so public knowledge, how can a holder of POET financial obligations feel comfortable with a paucity of information and a lack of transparency? Was the company created as a trough for salaries for career management or do they actually have a product that is viable and valuable enough to attract buyers?  It is disheartening to see so much of nothing coming from management except promises, nearly wild exclamations, poor public relation value, and salary expenses. 
   Where is the beef?