>>Spiny - c'mon now, don't you think they are drilling according to the data they have? Unless one is more expert then they are and have access to the same (or better) data then you have to trust their drilling choices.<<

Yeah, I know. Just getting a bit frustrated, that's all. The drilling proposed in the news release just seemed a bit scattered, drilling up new areas when you would think by now (especially after the last sumer of extensive drilling) that they would have pinpointed one or two areas to focus on. Instead, they did a lot of drilling to partially characterize an area, and now they're talking about looking for extensions, trenching, and bulk sampling, and testing new areas like Wildgoose. It almost sounds like they are more impressed by Sage's results than by their own. I know they are the experts, and I have faith in the team, but I would have liked to have seen a bit more focus by now. It's a huge land package, and eventually they (or somebody) will find something, but first they have to find and prove up a mineable deposit before they run out of money.