So my point to KXL IR - let the facts support the goods! Leave the flowery BS for con-artists and scammers.

King, in the words of June Cleaver ... "Ward, don't be too hard on The Beaver".

I am in a company now that is drilling in Idaho ... they now say they are looking at a "sullivan style" deposit. The Sulivan mine is in BC ... not sure how far away that is but I know it's not that close.

The BG area has been compared to Red Lake and Abitibi, simply because it is a greenstone belt. They have similar geology and in all those areas that geology extends a significant distance.

Look at Peru, there are mineral belts that extend the entire length of the country north to south. so while 200 miles may seem like a significant distance, it would not seem unrealistic that the new property might have similar geology to musselman lake.

Perhaps we're splitting hairs here and I do agree, the novice could read a lot more into this than what's there but it is what it is. Musselman ake is east and the geological surveys say they could be very similar. The Novice can also miss a lot in a news release that does not include assays and drill intersections.

Keep in mind that most of these NRs are written by Geos where "soon" means sometime in the next millenium and just east means within a few hundred kilometres. If the geo signature is the same or similar, distance doesn't really matter. Having said that, it still means nothing, all we have is potential ad potential can cost a few million to make it more than that.