Yes :-) One of those two....and I don't think (just opinion) its just one single broker or one single individual, but several and I also believe its likely they're working in concert with one another. Why? One thing is obvious, whoever goes to the trouble and expense to hide the identity of their brokerage...they don't want it known...No D'uh. And the only reason for doing that imo is because its part and parcel of an attempt to influence the market. In other words....manipulation.

That's my opinion, I can see no other logical explanation for hiding identies other than manipulation. The question then becomes....To what end?

Is it to make things more bullish than they are in order to facilitate dumping? I don't see any logic that would support that idea. If that were the case I would expect to see a flurry of bullish reccomendations coming from all manner of sources. I would also expect to see volumes exponentially higher than what we're seeing now. Its a widely held view that thinly traded stocks should be avoided.....both traders and investors are warned all the time of liquidity issues with stocks that trade volumes like we see with RVX.

So the only thing that I can come up with, is that we're witnessing manipulative trading designed to discourage prospective investors from jumping in, and to encourage existing shareholders to sell.

And that's fine with me....its all part of the game. I've been using this period to accumulate, and if my opinion is correct I should do very well.