Koo, your point is exactly the problem for most retail investors. They may understand the broad strokes of the RVX program but have no where close to the knowledge of say BDAZ or BKC and this is exactly why they need the professional third party validation that a top tier analyst gives. Until RVX addresses this issue the stock will continue to have a VERY limited following, especially when considering that any potential investor will probably look at a long term chart and this will further emphasize the need for concrete validation. Yes many investors follow the herd, this is why RVX needs to take the necessary steps to start accumulating a fresh and larger following.

BKC's and BDAZ's posts of today further illustrate RVX's communications failures even to the scientific community apparently, where generally very knowledgeable people are actively searching out the latest information in their fields of interest. RVX, being cutting edge, must do a MUCH better job at achieving wider recognition for their program.

It seems to me that management has definitely fallen into the trap of year after year doing exactly the same things while at the same time expecting a different result. As a shareholder this is extremely frustrating.