Tada...you and I are in general agreement I believe, I would just say that you express a higher degree of confidence than I am willing to.....I'm not saying you ARE more confident than myself, but merely that your postings here express more confidence than mine....I have been adding almost daily after all.

I agree that this was likely pretty much the most Sarah could say without running afoul of securities regulations...But the intent of my email wasn't to be made privy to information not in the public domain, but to push, nudge, cajole them into making more info available.  

The way things stand, based on the information that IS currently public, the company is broke....and yet they're operating, it seems, as if its "business as usual".  Like you I suspect they may very well have tapped into some capital that is bridging a gap....but to my mind that represents something material that should be disclosed.  Whether its (as you suspect) directors/employees possibly lending the company money, or some other avenue....whatever it is, it needs to be disclosed in my opinion.