Re: Under normal circumstances....
in response to
by
posted on
May 15, 2017 06:44PM
I'm replying to a post I did last week (on Friday) that showed a whole wack of trades with the W marker indicating that the iceberg portion of the order was unfilled. Was that the buyer's iceberg or the sellers? I think it was the buyer in this case that had an iceberg, house 002 RBC was the only buyer versus numerous sellers.....Here's a cut and paste of the cut and paste I did from that day, off the tmxmoney site:
002 bought 600 shares in two trades at $2.03 then bought 500 more at $2.04, and then 300 more at $2.05....and on up to the closing price of $2.09. While the broker handling the buying was always 002 or RBC (not saying it couldn't be multiple customers...although given the tight timeframe I think there's a good chance it was just one)
The sellers were anonymous, 007, 085, and 002...so if those houses had IceBergs, it sure looks like there was a buyer on Friday.
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.09 | 1,400 | 0.08 | TSX | 002 | 002 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.09 | 400 | 0.08 | TSX | 002 | 002 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.08 | 200 | 0.07 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.08 | 300 | 0.07 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.07 | 800 | 0.06 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.07 | 200 | 0.06 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.07 | 200 | 0.06 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.06 | 100 | 0.05 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.06 | 100 | 0.05 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:55 PM EDT | W | 2.06 | 200 | 0.05 | TSX | 002 | 002 |
05/12/2017 3:54 PM EDT | W | 2.06 | 400 | 0.05 | TSX | 002 | 085 |
05/12/2017 3:54 PM EDT | W | 2.06 | 200 | 0.05 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:54 PM EDT | W | 2.05 | 300 | 0.04 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:54 PM EDT | W | 2.04 | 500 | 0.03 | TSX | 002 | 001 |
05/12/2017 3:54 PM EDT | W | 2.03 | 100 | 0.02 | TSX | 002 | 007 |
05/12/2017 3:54 PM EDT | W | 2.03 | 500 | 0.02 | TSX | 002 | 001 |