hummmm,,,,,,,,my grade 10 general math curriculum head from 1970 is buzzing with bumbbly bees but is it not sensible to assume that the later these 250 MACE events accumulate to trigger this top line data the greater the chances that 208 has actually done what was expected and data should be in line with the trial design which would be on the good side of things??....we were anticipating 250 accumulated results from these ugly events mid 2017 and then the Fall or into late 2017,,,,so if we or DM were anticipating such activity timing and it just aint happened yet then in my simple mind its an unprecedented outcome for those in the trial and also for those who own RVX shares!!,,,,or am I missing something like when they started adding the alphabet into the math ,,thats when I knew it was time to get out,,,,jmo