"To comment further I would argue that GAC making an inference that the drug is working is pure speculation and goes against the terms of use that seems so readily enforced. I do however feel he has a right to his opinion and it is up to me to evaluate if it is credible or not. I certainly do not need others to be censoring what information I have access too or making the judgement as to what value it has. I would suggest no one reports it as a violation and it remains as part of the record."

Wow. That is really making a mountain out of a molehill Cancundude. I re-read the thread and never did GAC suggest that extended dosing means efficacy. A nothingburger in my opinion. If you can, please quote exactly what you feel is a violation. Otherwise, drop it and stop making an issue out of nothing.

BearDownAZ