Primary endpoint: Time vs Absolute Numbers

...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

GeorgeParros

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 1173 [?]

Votes: 16 Score: 4.0 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Primary endpoint: Time vs Absolute Numbers

posted on Nov 19, 2018 11:32AM

I keep wondering if this is a potential risk for BETonMACE.

The primary endpoint is the Time to the first occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).

Could this be a problem? Does it help us to meet the endpoint or not? Because, the way I see RRR calculated here is with events. 150 events on placebo, 100 on ABL, 33% RRR. Fine. But thats juste relative events on each side. Is no events = x amount of time on the trial? Will just people that had an event will count on the RRR calculation?