Re: Why didn't RVX run a phase 3 trial on CKD instead of the CVD trial we ran,...
posted on
Apr 26, 2019 12:52PM
"Why didn't the company run a phase 3 trial on CKD instead of the CVD trial BETonMACE,...?"
The short answer is that Resverlogix would have had to start in Phase 1 or 2 for either the stage 3 CKD or end stage renal disease (ESRD) program, and could not go straight to Phase 3 for a renal program. See long answer below.
The New Zealand Phase 1 trial was small (8 normal patients, 8 ESRD patients) who received a single oral dose of 100 mg of apabetalone and who were then followed for 1 to 7 days. These patients had to have been previously diagnosed with ESRD and not on dialysis (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2). So if Resverlogix wanted to pursue a Phase 3 trial in ESRD, they would have had to run more and larger Phase 1/2 trial(s) for both safety and efficacy before going into Phase 3. New Zealand published study is linked below.
Benefit of Apabetalone on Plasma Proteins in Renal Disease
ASSURE and SUSTAIN Phase 2 trials excluded patients with severe renal impairment (no ESRD patients). It was a small number of patients (13 placebo, 35 apabetalone) in the combined SUSTAIN and ASSURE analysis that qualified with the Stage 3 CKD eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. From the below publication "After combining data from the two trials, a total of 499 subjects received either 100mg b.i.d. of apabetalone (n=331) or placebo (n=168). In the SUSTAIN study, a total of 28 patients had baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with 18 randomized to the apabetalone group and 10 to the placebo group. In the ASSURE study, a total of 20 patients had baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with 17 randomized to the apabetalone group and 3 to the placebo group. A total of 48 patients were included in this post-hoc analysis." Furthermore, eGFR and alkaline phospatase changes were not pre-specified outcomes in either trial and was only tested in a post-hoc analysis that had marginal statistical significance (it was never designed or powered to be a CKD/eGFR study) as discussed here. So as stated for ESRD above, Resverlogix would have had to run more and larger Phase 1/2 trial(s) for both safety and efficacy in Stage 3 CKD patients before going into Phase 3. Combined SUSTAIN and ASSURE study linked below.