"I agree with Golf here 100%. GAC received a PM with questionable info. GAC was requested by the sender of PM to not share the content of the PM. GAC acknowledged that if the contents of the PM made the rounds on the board that it would spread FUD. GAC proceeded to share the contents of the PM as a post to the board anyway, which both violated the wishes of the sender of the PM and perpetuated the FUD that GAC acknowledged would happen if GAC shared the contents of the PM."

"It's possible that the thread containing the PM discussion will be taken down. A hub leader is looking into this."

I've seen a lot milder posts taken down within minutes, cant understand why the orginal post of GACS is still up along with the entire thread? It's clear gac knew what he was doing - who knows when someones says their buying all the time, for all we know they are covering,just sayin.

glta