Cityslicker99 - Thanks again for your insight. I'm learning about the scientific processes from your posts.

You wrote - Both Dr Wong and Dr Johansson have prior track records as clinical/laboratory researchers. They are quiet, cautious, thoughtful people who will not want to make a wrong move at a critical time. 

Your perception reflected above is one of the key reasons that I remain invested in and hopeful for RVX and the detailed findings to come on Nov 16th. I do believe that RVX and related scientists do high quality, thoughtful and reasonably well thought out science. I do not doubt their integrity and knowledge one iota.

As for my whining about ineffective communication I've spent my life as a communications researcher and strategist so I find it frustratinng that RVX does not take ownership of the perceptions of their brand within the investment community. I do understand why they do this. Retail investors are not their target market at this stage.

If RVX presents a breakthrough at the AHA then the press will take control of the brand and hopefully provide accurate messages that optimize the many incredible stories that RVX has to tell. If the results are positive but no breakthrough is achieved even though there may be huge business opportunities it will not get the same high profile. However, at that stage, the business press may pick up on the potential for investors.

Anyway, my points are quite irrelevant at this stage. It is all about the science  and I believe the science has been in highly qulified hands since the inception of the little biotech.

It will be a boring AGM to be sure.

Finally, no matter what happens on Nov 16th I have no doubts about RVX and ZE continuing their scientific journeys long into the future. Sometimes this company seems more like a university than a business.

GLTA

Toinv