No arguments from me on any of those points....the reason for my earlier opinion that top-line failure would mean a PPS of less than a canadian quarter is precisely for those very reasons.  I figured they absolutely needed top-line success in order to boost the PPS and then raise the money needed, not just to keep proceeding, but to simply keep operating.  

I agree that money is required now...or that it at least would seem that way based on all the fundamental information we have available.  But the company doesn't seem to me to be acting like cash is a concern....outside service providers are being engaged for things like yesterday's conference call, there's the trip to Philly in 2 weeks, a meeting with the FDA before  that....another conference call, the CTAD conference in San Diego.  

Oh well....one point my fave guru Granville made often, it was about the uselessness of fundamental information.