tada - I did not witness any pre-meeting interaction but that doesn't change the fact that he calmly asked a ligitimate question during the meeting and was booted. If DM wanted him booted, he should have waited until he did something disruptive. The guy has rights at the meeting also and shouldn't be subjected to Precrime sentencing. DM also referred to him disrupting the last meeting before but I was there and it was not disrupted. DM just does not like answering tough questions but with the $millions he has been paid and it not working to date, he owes shareholders to answer those questions as long as reasonable and calmly presented. It is often posted here that IR will not answer shareholders' questions and this was another case where I know it was a reasonable question.