...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
Message: Little confused, any insight would be great

Seeing the hepa fella step down would only make sense if 1) they had some sort of guarantee the loan would be paid back or has been paid back? Correct?

OR

2) Hepa knows RVX cannot pay the loan back & have no reason to believe they will make the upcoming deadline so the fella steps down anyway knowing they hold the IP & there getting everything ?They cant be hurt weather he stays or goes?Correct? 

OR &

3) if rvx has guaranteed them or paid them back that would be material & they/rvx would have to disclose this information immediately & not sit on it, correct?

OR 

4) What If Phama has made some sort of deal with Zenith ,whereby Zenith agrees to guarantee or has payed back the loan or the Pharma in question has guaranteed it or paid it back via part of the funds RVX would receive via a zen deal?- would or could this fall under the same disclosures rules as RVX or does Zenith & or Pharma possibly have more wiggle room being a private company when it comes to disclosure? Maybe the Pharma would have to be a private entity as well for this to work?

Anyway , can't get the Hepa fella stepping down out of my noodle given we have received zero information/reasoning for his departure.

GLTA

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply