Bill, this is getting beyond tedious. Centurion has little more incentive to short than any other entity. First, there are restrictions on their shorting that have been covered the times (plural) before when you brought this up. Look them up. Centurion has no control over when or how much SFMI borrows, and how many shares Centurion gets (and therefore how many they could short). They can only short once SFMI starts the process to borrow a chunk. THEY CANNOT SHORT OTHERWISE. And since we have been told that the LOC has not been accessed yet (something to do with the fact that the registration of shares has to be completed first, I presume), it is highly unlikely Centurion has shorted, unless they want their asses sued. Other reasons Centurion wouldn't short have also been discussed, including that they actually want the shares. There are also other general reasons not to short SFMI, but I won't go into them.

As far as

"Tell it like it is and be open to possibilities, you're as closed minded as the bashers on iflub."

you can shove it. We discuss SFMI here both pro and con. We just do it rationally and non-hysterically.