I'm checking with RK about this post from the other board. If it is true, we should know. If it is a typical lie from the shills, it is one more reason to tar and feather the bashers (town drunk is the author of this piece of what I believe to be fiction). He is really trying to undermine longs confidence. Why are they soooooo scared of sfmi? :)
Their was a plan for SFMI to make a Saftey Room in case of a tunnel collaspe but a second exit may also be needed to start mining of Sinkers ore. Now the only other thing is will they allow SFMI to mine without a second exit.I say and only me personally believe SFMI will be ordered to drain the audit above and connect the 2 audits so an escape exit is in place.If this is the case only ore between two audits will be able to be removed before any mining is allowed in the Sinker.This puts SFMI one year more behind. I also believe the Management knows of this future problem now and is not sharing this critical information to its shareholders.I feel it is my duty to inform the shareholders as this is what the Mining Industry wants a second exit to save lives.I have seen many companies now faced with this order and SFMI is no exception.