Thanks for having me on this board folks! I recognize some of you from other boards and was wondering where all the good posters had been hiding lol. Anyway, thanks again for having me!

Not sure how many folks on this board are familiar with Land Court laws but I recently filed a quiet title claim on one of my mortgages. Long and the short of it, the mortgage still had my original lender as the owner of the second mortgage recorded at my local Registry of Deeds. I hired an attorney who advised me to continue making payments to the servicer and not draw any attention to the mortgage while we file the quiet title in Land Court. Once the original lender that's been bankrupt for years now didn't respond in the allotted amount of time, that lien became free and clear and I basically told the servicer to screw and not contact me again or I'd sue them for every penny I've paid them thus far for a loan they never "legally" had rights to collect money on in the first place.

Why and I mentioning this on an SFMI board? Well, I had a theory that with all of the new claims we've apparently been successfully aquiring, my thoughts are similar to what my attorney had advised me when I did the equivelant action. In layman's terms perhaps PQ, et al DO NOT want much attention on this little thing of ours while they're performing quiet title actions. If someone inherited any of these claims and didn't really know much about it they wouldn't even pay it any mind whereas if they were notified about land that they own holding billions in Gold and Silver they might take the time to claim their land. Not to mention cheap shares for the buyback, etc.

This is a theory of mine and nothing more but was hoping to see if anyone else on the board had any insight to the Land Court laws? They vary from state to state and I have no idea what Idaho's laws on quiet titles are.