Thank you for the corrections. If PQ is going to do interviews he should be consistent because investors IMO are more detail oriented nowadays and may get confused if the information isn't the same when doing DD. What I don't get about SFMI and other public companies is that there seems to be a lack of proof reading when it comes to assay reports, PR's , etc. As for Ed, I don't believe he's picky, I think he has higher expectations of how the company conveys important data to the investor.