Rick- In general, I agree with your post about ihub. Many of the posts removed are removed because of real violations, usually the long not being able to resist getting in a dig about other posters. However, ihub admin is indeed biased (some would say corrupt). I have seen posts by longs removed for the flimsiest of reasons, often involving willful misinterpretation, while posts by bashers with clear violations stay up despite TOS reports and removal attempts by honest mods. As you mentioned, Rocketstocks is notorious for wrongly removing on topic posts, but he is equally adamant about continually restoring his own posts when another mod removes them, even multiple times on the same post. When admin was contacted about it, they said they would do something about it if it continued to happen, but they never did despite multiple recurrences and reminders. If ihub genuinely enfocrced the rules honestly and evenly, they might be defended (although the system itself is flawed in the ways you mentioned), but as is their actions are patently dishonest and biased. There is nothing defensible about ihub.