Good one Take..

It 'seems' there is always the 'sleeze' factor present, for all these years. When the question of ethics comes up, it never has heft but it never has left. So, what is the integrity of the 'new group' who have some sort of 'gaming busiiness' slash/profit carrot? What pitfalls exist on both sides? Which one can outsmart the other one? Why don't shareholders count outside of lip service, uh: "check with the 'compensation committee' ". Why isn't the FOCUS on the resource rather than the sideshow antics? Why have the "Qs" made it all about the shell and not the seed?

I will be most impressed and surprised if the 'new group' has any real depth, integrity, financial clout, track record, mining knowledge, relevant education, success etc. 'Masked riders' may be just the right terminology. I suspect we have two entities here that are trying hard to outsmart each other for the supposed pile of marbles. It will be yet another peculiar deal.

I hope I' wrong.