That final post was not the only factor. He had not been here long, and every single post had included digs at the stock. Some were left up, some were not, depending on whether they really contributed to the discussion. The post you mentioned was removed based on the following: It was a negative post in that the "pitfalls" you mention were indeed relative to SFMI. But if you're looking for general mining posts relevant to SFMI, this would be about the most negative one could find. Right now in fact there are a lot of articles around about the resurgence of the miners. Why post the negative one? Combine no track record, consistently negative posts, no real contribution in that we've heard it all before, and an attack on the hub leader, and it finally crossed the line.