Free
Message: One possible process for treating Silverado's Antimony/Gold - Goldfreak

One possible process for treating Silverado's Antimony/Gold - Goldfreak

posted on Oct 25, 2009 07:21AM
Process flow-sheet for gold and antimony recovery from stibnite




References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

S. Ubaldini, , a, F. Vegliòb, P. Fornaria and C. Abbruzzesea

a Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute of Mineral Processing, Via Bolognola 7, 00138 Rome, Italy

b University of Genova, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, via Opera Pia 15, 16145 Genoa, Italy


Received 10 February 2000;
revised 20 April 2000;
accepted 26 April 2000.
Available online 7 August 2000.

Abstract

Recovery of gold from refractory ores requires a pretreatment to liberate the gold particles from the host mineral. In particular, in the case of stibnite (Sb2S3), the antimony (Sb) forms stable compounds with sodium cyanide (NaCN) during the cyanidation process; as a consequence, cyanide consumption increases. Pretreatment is usually an oxidation step. As an alternative, chemical leaching can be applied to liberate the gold particles from the sulfur matrix.

The aim of the present investigation was to ascertain — at laboratory scale — the best conditions for alkaline leaching of a refractory gold-bearing Sb2S3 (13.25% Sb2S3; 30 g t−1 Au) coming from South America. The solutions were constituted by sodium sulfide (Na2S) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Main parameters studied were: Na2S concentration, NaOH concentration, pulp density and temperature.

After leaching, antimony has been recovered by electrodeposition, in order to increase the economical convenience of the subsequent gold extraction. Antimony recovery has been about 70% Sb for suitable conditions of leaching and electrowinning. Metallic antimony with high purity was obtained.

After the study of the leaching parameters, the influence of the pretreatment on the cyanidation process has been evaluated. It was revealed that the chemical pretreatment improves the gold extraction yield and favours a low consumption of reagents: after cyanidation low recovery has been obtained without pretreatment (about 30% Au), while a high gold recovery was achieved in the case of the pretreated samples (about 75% Au), considering also the subsequent steps of carbon concentration–purification and electrowinning.

In conclusion, experimental results have shown the technical feasibility of the alkaline leaching pretreatment prior to the conventional cyanidation; moreover, a complete process flow-sheet with low environmental impact, considering technical and economical factors, is proposed.

Author Keywords: Stibnite; Gold; Antimony; Alkaline pretreatment; Factorial experiments; Cyanidation; Refractory ores

Article Outline

1. Introduction1.1. Theoretical basis2. Experimental2.1. Ore characterisation2.2. Chemical reagents2.3. Antimony recovery by alkaline leaching and electrowinning2.4. Cyanidation of the pretreated residue for gold recovery2.5. Concentration, purification and precipitation of the gold (adsorption/desorption/electrowinning tests)3. Results and discussion3.1. Alkaline leaching of the synthetic Sb2S3 and Sb2S3 ore3.2. Sb recovery by electrowinning3.3. Cyanidation of the pretreated residue for gold recovery3.4. Concentration, purification and precipitation of the Au (adsorption/desorption/electrowinning tests)3.5. Preliminary flow-sheet of the integrated process4. ConclusionsAcknowledgementsReferences

I hope this might help you Goldfreak - having studied both inorganic & inorganic Chemistry as well as Biochemistry at U. of Toronto, I am sure the above will be far too complicated for most of our members. One really needs a P.H.D. or Masters in Chemistry to understand everything here - there are other methods available as well. Perhaps 3x10e6 could add further comments.


Fig. 1. Sb extraction yield calculated vs. Sb extraction yield experimental: factorial model including only the significant main and interaction effects (see Table 9).


View Within Article


Fig. 2. Two-way table to focalize the significant first order interaction (AB).


View Within Article


Fig. 3. Two-way table to focalize the significant first order interaction (AC).


View Within Article


Fig. 4. Concentration decay curves of antimony by electrowinning.


View Within Article


Fig. 5. X-ray diffraction pattern of metallic antimony deposit obtained at 150-A/m−2 current intensity.


View Within Article


Fig. 6. Schematic flow-sheet of the overall process: leaching and electrometallurgical treatment for antimony and gold recovery from a refractory Sb2S3.


View Within Article

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply