Free
Message: Re: what do you suppose?-Conclusion, IMHO
5
Jan 14, 2010 07:46PM
5
Jan 14, 2010 08:35PM

...So in conclusion, the bashers and nay-sayers would have us believers believe instead that the company is a scam because (this is just a small sample):

  1. That the less than 3 year old lode source drilling program is a farce and the assay results are faked.
  2. That the 20+ year search for the Nolan lode sources via placer mining and other geotechnical studies were just to support Tri-Con. (Even though only a fraction of all costs incurred were attributible to Tri-Con over the years. Now, if Tri-Con also ran the assay labs, was the equipment and infrastructure supplier, the supplier of permits, if Bundtzen worked for Tri-Con, and on and on and on, then maybe they'd have a point.)
  3. That the severe decline in gold markets and the ferocious nature of this business and markets and the ignorant venomous press (like WND/SG) should have made Silverado profitable by now, if they are legit.
  4. That Tom Bundtzen is in on the scam and his prefeasibility report is faked and is a big fat lie.
  5. That the work on Ester Dome and Eagle Creek where antimony and gold was discovered, mined and sold is also all a lie. That the 18,000 Toz in gold bars poured were really made from Tungsten. And the antimony mined and sold was really tightly balled up Reynolds Wrap (TM)
  6. That company detractors that reside in Alaska and elsewhere and post horrible and venomous personal statements about the company owner, his wife and all the staff at Silverado really is a very intelligent person who has no axe to grind with Silverado but is just looking out for us, to not loose our money.

Gotta stop there. Could go on for 20 more, but you get the picture. No time to spell check, gotta go.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply