We have heard explanation after explanation after explanation concerning proven,probable,inferred on and on and on. Even the differences in language on what is accecptable according to the sec regulations and that of Canada. Why do the same posters on yahoo and RB and we all know who they are continue to deny the validity of the report and claim there is not enough mineable gold for any major co. to be interested in, or for slglf to become a profitable co. What could their real motive be?