Hi Randal,

I have not be able to confirm whether this is a rumour or not.

As you know, the company is hot on the trail of a KIM trail that I have assumed to be from a second kimberlite body. This might be wrong, of course.

I'll contact the company to find out more, if they are forthcoming with any information.

If new find (if indeed there is one) is an extension of the Mud lake kimberlite, then, of course, it may be associated with the same eruption event. At the very least, this will add tonnage to the amount of kimberlite known so far. This will only be good, of course, if they can prove that there is a significant amount of diamonds at Mud lake.

Lots of ifs at this stage. I guess that we will have to wait for more news.

All the best...peterjr