Re: the assays
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 23, 2008 07:20AM
The Company has three main projects: a PGE project in Montana's Stillwater District; a copper project in California's historic Moonlight Copper Mining District; and a nickel-copper-cobalt-PGE project in Ferguson Lake, Nunavut.
And that is what needs an additional comment or two John. We do not know where hole number 393 is in relation to another good hole. It is possible that it is not a 'lone ranger' but connected in some way to another hole with similiar results. If not, then okay but if so, then they should let us and others know.
In this present business climate a CEO and or the Board cannot use the same tactics they used to employ if they want support from investment community. "Old school" says, "I will give the investors what I want them to know, when I think they should know about it". or "they will never get that from me". [note the quote]. Not withstanding legalities and any on-going tactical situations; investors are looking for transparancy AND current information. This is especially so when we are waiting for assay results. The web site must be current and offer some well worded and potentially exciting news. We do not need to hear a monitone hum-drum, dry, lifeless, rote, explanation of the results. STARFIELD RESOURCES needs to *paint a picture* without going ape with emotions or hype.
On the other side of the coin, investors cannot expect the company to have something new to say every day just to please people that are emotional crybabies. Starfield cannot stop world events and if we are down partially because of the general market climate then we are going to have to hunker down and wait and wait some more. I for one am willing to do that because I believe that I have accurately discerned the "Starfield story" and I like what I see and know.
Just my opinion John and I do not think I am alone here.
Jerry Francis