Welcome To the Stock Synergy, Momentum & Breakout HUB On AGORACOM

Edit this title from the Fast Facts Section

Free
Message: Peak Oil Report - article

Peak Oil Report - article

posted on Apr 19, 2010 08:56AM

Sorry for the length of this....I didn't have a link to post.

    , Editor Tom Whipple

    , Publisher Steve Andrews

    1. Prices and Production

    Oil prices had a volatile week, falling below $83 a barrel on Tuesday, climbing above $86 on Wednesday and Thursday and then sinking to settle at $83.24 on Friday after the SEC charged Goldman-Sachs with securities fraud. Most analysts are interpreting the plunge as a temporary knee-jerk reaction to the fraud charges.

    The markets currently are faced with many conflicting signals ranging from increasing unemployment and foreclosures in the US to increasing consumer demand for gasoline as national averages approach $3 a gallon. Throw in the Greek debt negotiations, which send the US dollar up or down every few days, and surging demand for all forms of energy from Beijing and you have the ingredients to make any kind of case for the future of oil prices that you want.

    US refineries are reported to have produced more gasoline in March, 9.3 million b/d, than in any month on record and the API says that US oil product consumption in March increased by 3.5 percent, year over year, to 19.3 million b/d in March.

    Technical analysts continue to talk of higher oil prices and Kuwait’s Oil Minister said OPEC will increase production if oil prices rise above $100 a barrel.

    Current projections foresee very little opportunity for the world’s spare production capacity to increase significantly in the next few years - if ever. The IEA now sees global demand reaching 86.6 million b/d this year, the level achieved in March. If this number is achieved, the world will soon be in a position where there is only 5 million b/d or so of spare capacity to satisfy surging demand in Asia and Gulf States. Throw in any revival in OECD demand and the ingredients for another price spike are forming.

    2. Isolating Iran

    So long as 17 million barrels of the world’s crude supply is transiting the Straits of Hormouz each day, the Middle East political situation will be of paramount concern. Close this vital waterway and the global economy would be in chaos within days, if not hours. For several years now, the top geopolitical issue in the region has been Iran’s uranium enrichment program. Tehran steadfastly maintains that the enrichment is for peaceful purposes, but also refuses to give international inspectors the access needed to verify that the country is not developing nuclear weapons. Israel, which could be completely destroyed by a small number of nuclear weapons delivered by missile or terrorists, is determined that Iran shall never develop a nuclear capability and has implied repeatedly that it will go to war to prevent this. Other Middle Eastern states, particularly the Saudis, do not want to see an unstable, nuclear-armed Iran dominating the region.

    So far efforts by the US and EU to impose sanctions on Iran through the UN have been thwarted by Russian and China. These nations either believed Tehran’s denials or did not perceive the threat of a nuclear armed Iran as outweighing their desire to obtain oil from Iran, sell to the Iranians, or make trouble for the West.

    In recent months, however, these attitudes appear to have shifted. Moscow and Beijing seem to have come to the conclusion that a war involving Iran, which would likely slow or shut down oil shipments from the Middle East, would be far more inimical to their interests than joining in efforts to pressure Tehran on the issue.

    In recent weeks, an increasing list of companies, under US and EU pressure, have announced that they will no longer supply the refined oil products which Iran needs to power roughly 50 percent of its economy. It is becoming increasing difficult to transfer money in and out of Iran and the Iranians are finding it impossible to obtain letters of credit to finance trade.

    Recently Beijing has been playing both sides of the issue. The Chinese continue to say they support a diplomatic resolution of the conflict and continue to sell gasoline to Tehran, but have apparently agreed to join negotiations on a new package of sanctions on Iran. The key issue for Beijing is just how severe do sanctions on Iran have to be in order to bring about policy changes, while at the same time not do permanent harm to the Sino-Iranian oil trade.

    Although the real negotiations are going on in private, judging from the increasingly shrill statements coming from Tehran, such as demands that the US give up its nuclear weapons, the Iranians are clearly beginning to feel the pressure. One of the key questions for the next few years is whether this issue can be resolved peacefully and without a reduction of oil exports from the region.

    3. Defense turns pessimistic

    It is ironic that the first component of the US government to warn that the US is going to face massive disruptions caused by oil shortages should be the armed services. If one reads the fine print, the most recent

    Joint Operating Environment

    document that is published annually admonishes that the Department of Defense is not actually forecasting that there will be oil shortages in the next few years; they are just saying they could happen, and it might be useful if the Department started planning for them.

    Military organizations spend a lot of time planning for contingencies. When they perceive the imminent potential for global economic and political chaos caused by oil shortages, coupled with a threat to their own requirements for prodigious amounts of oil products each day, they feel impelled to point this out. Naturally the document has plenty of caveats about this not being official policy.

    The headline conclusions of the analysis are that "by 2012 surplus oil production capacity could entirely disappear and as early as 2015, the shortfall could reach 10 million b/d." The report does not see the looming problem as lack of adequate petroleum reserves, but rather a shortage of drilling platforms, engineers, and refining capacity. The authors seem to miss the problems of depletion, which is removing 4 million b/d of production capacity from the world’s oil output each year, or the nationalism which is hampering oil output around the world, or the extremely high costs of developing deepwater oil fields.

    The conclusion that surplus production capacity could disappear within the next two or three years is somewhat more pessimistic than others are currently talking about – but not a lot more pessimistic. The "forecast" of a 10 million b/d shortfall within the next five years certainly gets one’s attention, but breezes over the intervening developments such as much higher oil prices resulting in sharply lower demand and economic setbacks. While a little shaky on the details, the Defense Department certainly has the general idea -- that major problems surround the availability of oil.

    Interestingly, the report warns that, should a deep economic depression emerge in the US, the Defense Department could lose substantial funding as it did in the 1930s and that dictatorships could emerge from the political chaos around the world.

    Energy Stat of the Week

    1. IEA data show that world oil production hit a high in 2007 at 86.51 million b/d before declining to 86.21 million b/d in 2008 and 84.93 million b/d in 2009. That was the first contraction over two successive years since the 1980s. IEA now projects oil demand this year of 86.6 million b/d, a new all-time high and up 30,000 b/d from last month’s forecast.
    2. Share
      New Message
      Please login to post a reply