For the full version of this essay and more, visit Sunshine Profits' website.

This past week we saw gold have its biggest two-day drop since February of last year ending the third longest streak of trading above its 50-day that the yellow metal has had since 2000. The first streak ended in 2002 with 124 trading days and the second in 2008 with 143 trading days. No bull market goes up in a straight line.

What was the trigger?

Could it have been investors rebalancing their portfolios for the New Year? Worries that an economic recovery will curb demand for the metal as a haven? Reports that US companies added almost three times more jobs in December than analysts forecast? Was it the dollar rising for three days against a basket of major currencies?

We are likely to see much volatility in 2011 as investors swing from fear to greed and back again. There is a relatively new phenomenon mostly discussed on trading floors and by professional managers. It’s called “Risk On-- Risk Off.”

It goes something like this: Investors either believe the future is good and risk appetite is ON; or else they believe the future is doom and gloom and risk is OFF. What is different since the subprime fiasco of 2008 is that there doesn’t seem to be much of a middle ground. Exuberant optimism and gloomy pessimism oscillate nervously within the markets and the prices of a variety of assets move up and down with them.

On this seesaw, when risk is on, equities and commodities rise and credit spreads narrow and the Japanese yen falls. When risk is off, they switch. Correlations between various asset classes that historically hardly moved together are now highly polarized, either strongly positive or strongly negative. If in normal market conditions the price of any given asset is driven by a variety of forces and factors, in today’s markets many assets are being driven by the Risk On -- Risk Off phenomenon.

As far as the Risk Off side of the equation, there are plenty of worries to keep even a normally sound-sleeping investor awake at night. My firm ha covered them in previous articles -- quantitative easing, sovereign debt, currency wars, eurozone problems, a housing market where one in seven mortgages is delinquent or in foreclosure, inflation, deflation, hyperinflation, etc.

Speaking of hyperinflation, if you want to read something that might keep you awake at night, read an article by long-time trader and author Victor Sperandeo in the latest issue of Barron's. Sperandeo has traded for many top investors, including George Soros.

He writes that investors in US debt around the world are growing closer to a "psychological breaking point" that could force a "run on the bank" against Treasuries.

If that happens, hyperinflation will quickly follow and gold will soar much, much higher. We have already seen signals from China that it intends to cut its holdings of US Treasuries. Anyone who believes that the United States faces a comparatively mild 1970s-style inflation risk is ignoring history at his own peril, says Sperandeo. He writes:

Hyperinflation has a single cause: It occurs when a government cannot borrow money because its debt has risen so much that investors believe they will never be paid back with close to the same purchasing power. As a consequence of this flight of confidence, such a government is forced to print money to meet its obligations. This further undermines the value of its currency, often culminating in a frenzied collapse. That is hyperinflation, and only governments and central banks cause it.

US government debt is now over $13.7 trillion (not including estimated states’ debt of $2.8 trillion and agencies’ debt of $3.0 trillion). The average rollover period for the debt is 49 months. With recent deficits running over $1 trillion a year, the Treasury issues new debt and refunds old debt at a rate of about $4.3 trillion a year. A nation needs to inspire a lot of confidence to keep that Ponzi scheme alive. Unfortunately, markets know that even the US government will print money to meet expenses when necessary.

Investors know that the tiny gap between what they are paid to hold Treasury debt versus the inflation rate can quickly turn into a loss. If the gap narrows by too much, there is no longer any compelling incentive to hold the debt. Investors will rush for the doors not wanting to be left holding the bag.

Meanwhile, there are many voices out there screaming "breakdown in gold," "get out," and "the rally is over." Given such a positive fundamental situation for gold, one would need to be particularly convinced that lower prices are likely before deciding to sell their holdings. Do charts really provide necessary evidence? Let's take a look (charts courtesy by http://stockcharts.com).



The above GLD ETF chart provides a medium-term view back to early 2008. Gold is seen to be holding above the long-term rising support line. Consequently, the trend remains up, and thus higher prices are still likely from here.

The volume levels have been high lately along with lower prices in the yellow metal, which is generally a bearish signal. Still, it is very much in tune with what we've seen previously during gold's corrections, which were not followed by a serious plunge -- they were followed by rallies.

For the above reasons, the sentiment has not turned from bullish to bearish and the price decline was definitely something unexpected. There is always such a possibility, however at this time it can be considered an anomaly.

What about gold from the non-USD perspective?



In this week’s Gold:UDN ratio chart (the average of gold priced in currencies other than the US dollar), we see further confirmation of points made earlier from our regular USD perspective.

In the past month, as in most of last year, the 50-day moving average has provided support, typically being tested at points coinciding with local bottoms for the past 12 months. This is where we find gold’s price today, indicating that a bottom is at hand or is quite close.

The signs are not such that a great deal of excitement should manifest itself at this time, at least not until a breakdown is seen. Since current price levels are not below the levels of recent highs, the breakdown has not yet materialized. Some intra-day price volatility to lower levels has been seen but should not be regarded as significant at this time.



We now look at gold’s price relative to corporate bonds in our final gold chart this week. This index level continues to consolidate at levels above previous highs and therefore the bullish implications still stand.

Summing up, although much has happened this week, the situation and the outlook for the yellow metal has changed little. Although there may seem to be increased risk with volume levels increasing and gold’s price declining, other signals from a technical-analysis standpoint appear bullish. The target level of $1,600 still holds and the upside potential is actually even greater than what has been seen in recent weeks. All-in-all, the risk-reward ratio is pretty much unchanged.