"Here is one for you. Why is it none of you guys are willing to discuss the technical charting aspects say on a weekly basis to enlighten us all on the direction of the stock? Not one."

I answered that fully in my last post. That can be interpreted daily, weekly, or monthly. Here is what I said

The stock has tripled since the last annual meeting. A pullback after a big run up to digest those gains is normal.

and

The stock rose from 5.95 to 7.26 in three weeks going into the annual meeting. That's one hell of a nice move. Technically this can go all the way back to 5.95 and nothing would be wrong.

Now combine that with Dan Norcini's spread ratio trade and the new shorting rules taking effect on Feb 28. See below

The following is information from Dr. Jim Decosta:

Here is the URL:

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/RuleFilings/2010/P121892?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FINRARuleFilings+(FINRA+Rule+Filings)

Quote: There’s 3 new laws gaining attention in the NSS market reform arena: FINRA 4320 goes into effect on 2/28/11. It mandates 13 day buy-ins for open delivery failures FINALLY applying to shares of non-reporting corporations. FINRA 2010-043, also starting on 2/28/11 reinstates the “short sale exempt” (SSE) marking requirements for trade reporting and the OATS system. Those MMs accessing the bona fide MM exemption from executing pre-borrows or “locates” before admittedly naked short sales must now FORMALLY acknowledge the accessing of that universally-abused exemption. Being that these trades are theoretically being made to “inject liquidity” then the excuse to hide the related trade data from the public’s eyes goes out the window. You can’t have it both ways and claim the bona fide MM exemption and later claim that the related trade data needs to be kept secret because it might reveal a “proprietary trading strategy”.

Truly bona fide MMs that are able to legally access that universally-abused exemption cover their naked short position on the next downtick after their short sale when buy side liquidity is in need of being ejected as share prices fall. The 3rd new rule which is in effect now states that the offers and bids that MMs post must be of approximately the same size. No longer can the offers be of 1 million shares and the offsetting bid good for the minimum 5,000 shares.

The verbiage in 4320 is especially well done as it FINALLY puts the clearing firms that aid and abet this crime wave on the spot. With the FFETF, which is made up of 25 different agencies, now on the scene the transparency has increased markedly. You can imagine how critical the lack of transparency is to a crime involving selling nonexistent securities and then refusing to ever deliver that which you sold AFTER being allowed access to the funds of the investor being defrauded.

Here are the links to the rules SR-FINRA-2010-028 and SR-FINRA-2010-043:
www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/RuleFilings/2010/P121522

Notice the part I marked in bold in the quote above:
"FINRA 4320 goes into effect on 2/28/11. It mandates 13 day buy-ins for open delivery failures FINALLY applying to shares of non-reporting corporations."

Also the CFTC position limit rulings that start within the next two months.

Also take into account the large short/ naked short position in this stock and confirmed by AGM comments by JS. Think of what happens to this stock and others within the Precious Metals sector that have not been allowed to trade freely over the past decade. That is about to change.