Calmlyrational,

Could you please be more clear?

You say that you have, "consistently pointed out that Dave Webb has economic incentives that are similar to those of Tyhee's shareholders." But, that they may "not be entirely identical". And that, " His role of CEO may at times provide him personal incentives that while directionally similar may not be optimal for an independent shareholder."

Could you please substantiate your claim that Dave's "incentives" are that are not identical to ours, and why they may not be optimal for us independent shareholders?

Moreover, you suggested, "I would hope that with the incredible trashing of the stock over the last few years in spite of significant progress made, Dave might wonder whether he might be better off rethinking his communications with his shareholders."

In hindsight, how could Dave have improved "communications with his shareholders" during the time when, not only did Tyhee's stock get trashed but most all of the juniors took a severe beating?

Are you suggesting that with better communication, Dave might have prevented that "trashing"?

Thanks,

Baires