Pardon me, as I am just catching up on the posts. However, I wanted to comment on the deletion of the John Doody quote. If Doody made the statement about the 'dog with fleas', then the person quoted him directly in response to a request for Doody information from someone on the board. Deleting this comment was entirely wrong. Doody is one of the newsletter writers discussed on this board from time to time. He is not a quack without any credibility, nor a spam artist. Consequently, deleting his comment is clearly a unilateral act of censorship. Just because it was an apparent criticism of Tyhee, does not give this person the right to delete the post from everyone's view. I do not need this person to evaluate the contents of a post for me. We are all adults here and understand that people post behind 'usernames' and that we must be wary of anything said here. Indeed, we recently heard that Agoracom itself might be a pumper's mechanism. If the hub leaders have free reign to delete anything they want without boundaries, this forum will become useless for the general Tyhee population. While I do not think that the post was deleted with malice, we should lighten up and err on the side of disclosure.