TYHEE GOLD CORP

(PRESS PROFILE TAB FOR FACT SHEET & UPDATES)

Free
Message: How fitting is this title!

Skeleg raises an interesting point. He says,

"I think because once you get this close to building a mine and going into production, you become valued much better."

That´s an encouraging idea, BUT I have trouble seeing Guyana Goldfields as an example. If anything, their SP is now lower than a year ago.

In contrast to Tyhee, they claim 5.7m oz M&I Au, at a Tyhee-like grade of 3.8gpt, but at a cash cost of $400/oz Au with a mine life of 17 years producing 3,000 Au ounces per year.

Does this justify their Mktcap of $750m? If you look at their SP over the last 4 years, unlike Tyhee, they´ve had a consistently high Mktcap.

Who was it who said the market is always right?

Anyway, Skel´s idea of a higher valuation following a positive FS (my words) with production closer to the horizon is an exciting one. One that I believe Greg Taylor and many of us embrace. But is it inevitable, or even historically correct?

If so, someone, anyone,please show me an example.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply