The reviewer says: "for a company with a quality project, they did a poor job describing their story". He says clearly it is a "quality project" and that it is a slam dunk five bagger over the next few months, and a likely 10 bagger at the time it goes into production, which from .17 at the time of publication takes it to .85 at the 5-bagger slam dunk level and $1.70 at the ten bagger level upon production. His lowered rating (3.0 rather than 3.5 as he says) is really based only on "uncertainty", he says, which in the end is only because of the absurd and inexplicably low share price, not anything he can put his finger on. He is scratching his head the same as the rest of us. And that was written at .17 - now we are trading at .08??

There is, need I say at risk of boring everyone on this Board to death, something going on, so how do you explain it in your own mind, Baires? How can Interinvest be buying like crazy, already own well over 10% - mainly in the laxly regulated US market I note ("laxly" I say, based on what we have seen with Corzine et al), and not have some idea what is happening, and not have some plan which will benefit themselves? I am assuming self interest only, not even opportunism, and certainly not breach of fiduciary duty as described by Hansix previously. But I believe we have been far too complacent in accepting all this, don't you Baires? Hansix? ike