Hansix,

To answer your question I would like to clarify my interpretation of rhetoric...which is no easy task...because it indeed has many different definitions. Sample definitions.

Rhetoric is a way of conveying, for purposes of persuasion (or not), ideas to an audience in an effective way. It can also be "elaborate, pretentious, insincere or intellectually vacuous".

So, for me to offer my thoughts on Tyhee would not necessarily reflect on the true direction of Tyhee...in the long run. I can sympathis(z)e with wanting to keep all conversations positive about this company...but...why? No matter how much I go on about the glorious sunshine outside at the moment...it's not going to change the fact that I am typing this on a moonlit night.

I will not deny that seeing this stock at .07 with .065 on the ask does not provide any kind of comfort to the the average investor here. And yet I suspect your words of encouragement are indeed welcomed by many. But the reality is sir, all of Hans horses and all of Hans men, do not appear to be putting Humpty together again. Granted, times are tough for securing financing, and no doubt your words with management are encouragement enough to provide enough glue to solidify confidence for yourself and others. But even the hope of the elusive $2000 gold and a published NI43-101 has not made the money changers any looser with their change.

I have followed the path of lying (and I have no qualms using that word) management with past ventures and, hence, reality will always speak volumes when compared to rhetoric. I have been one to bear witness to many a duck (maybe it's a Crow thing) and how they look, fly and quack.

Perhaps if more open discussion were allowed here, then investors could learn more from a school of hard knocks...then a school of soft landings.

I remain, sir, one of your Humble Hub Leaders.